We have this table...
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Document](
[DocumentID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[HumanResourceID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Name] [nvarchar](256) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[Description] [nvarchar](256) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT
NULL,
[ContentType] [nchar](4) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[Content] [image] NOT NULL,
[DateEntered] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[DateModified] [datetime] NULL,
[Version] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
[EmployeeID] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [Resume_PK] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ResumeID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, FILLFACTOR = 90) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
Content contains the bits that make up either Word or RTF documents.
We have FTI defined on Content / ContentType / DocumentID. Generally FT
searches are working.
The table contains over 130k documents.
Through our application we are limiting their searches to the top 1500 rank
of any FT search. (So as not to over-burden our server.)
This works when the want to search the table for documents within the entire
company.
But what they would really like is the top 1500 rank for documents within
their office.
Is there a way to partition the the table by an OfficeID with some what to
pre-filter so the FT search is only looking at Documents from one or more
OfficeIDs?
TIA - Kyle!
I think I found my answer...although a lot of work.
Remove the FTI from the table.
Add an OfficeID column to the table and populate it.
Partition the table by the OfficeID column.
Create an Indexed View for each OfficeID
(Open a new office, the add a new OfficeID and a new Indexed View for that
OfficeID.)
(Close an existing Office, migrate the documents to a different office, drop
the FTI for that View and drop that View)
Add a FTI to each of the Indexed Views.
Mod the application so it knows what how to FT search one or more Indexed
Views and combine the results from multiple views if needed.
"Kyle Jedrusiak" <kjedrusiak@.princetoninformation.com> wrote in message
news:OitVbpuHHHA.1468@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> We have this table...
> CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Document](
> [DocumentID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
> [HumanResourceID] [int] NOT NULL,
> [Name] [nvarchar](256) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL,
> [Description] [nvarchar](256) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT
> NULL,
> [ContentType] [nchar](4) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL,
> [Content] [image] NOT NULL,
> [DateEntered] [datetime] NOT NULL,
> [DateModified] [datetime] NULL,
> [Version] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
> [EmployeeID] [int] NULL,
> CONSTRAINT [Resume_PK] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
> (
> [ResumeID] ASC
> )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, FILLFACTOR = 90) ON
> [PRIMARY]
> ) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
> Content contains the bits that make up either Word or RTF documents.
> We have FTI defined on Content / ContentType / DocumentID. Generally FT
> searches are working.
> The table contains over 130k documents.
> Through our application we are limiting their searches to the top 1500
> rank of any FT search. (So as not to over-burden our server.)
> This works when the want to search the table for documents within the
> entire company.
> But what they would really like is the top 1500 rank for documents within
> their office.
> Is there a way to partition the the table by an OfficeID with some what to
> pre-filter so the FT search is only looking at Documents from one or more
> OfficeIDs?
> TIA - Kyle!
>
|||Hello Kyle,
The other option is to add the office ID to the content (If the content was
editable i.e. text/html)
Then use a query like containstable(document, content,'OFFICE2345 AND "SQL
SERVER DBA"')
If the content is editabel this is by far the more manageable, and scalable.
We did the index view thing and it is just not a neat solution. The token
thing is much easier.
Simon Sabin
SQL Server MVP
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/simons
[vbcol=seagreen]
> I think I found my answer...although a lot of work.
> Remove the FTI from the table.
> Add an OfficeID column to the table and populate it.
> Partition the table by the OfficeID column.
> Create an Indexed View for each OfficeID
> (Open a new office, the add a new OfficeID and a new Indexed View for
> that
> OfficeID.)
> (Close an existing Office, migrate the documents to a different
> office, drop
> the FTI for that View and drop that View)
> Add a FTI to each of the Indexed Views.
> Mod the application so it knows what how to FT search one or more
> Indexed Views and combine the results from multiple views if needed.
> "Kyle Jedrusiak" <kjedrusiak@.princetoninformation.com> wrote in
> message news:OitVbpuHHHA.1468@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
|||Um, maybe I'm missing something here, but since you are using the rank
I'm assuming you are using CONTAINSTABLE or FREETEXTTABLE and joining
back to Document. I'm also assuming you are using a "TOP 1500" and an
"ORDER BY Rank" in your query. Could you then just add "AND OfficeID =
'USEROFFICEID'" to your WHERE clause after adding the OfficeID field to
the table?
On Dec 14, 7:32 pm, Simon Sabin <SimonSa...@.noemail.noemail> wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hello Kyle,
> The other option is to add the office ID to the content (If the content was
> editable i.e. text/html)
> Then use a query like containstable(document, content,'OFFICE2345 AND "SQL
> SERVER DBA"')
> If the content is editabel this is by far the more manageable, and scalable.
> We did the index view thing and it is just not a neat solution. The token
> thing is much easier.
> Simon Sabin
> SQL Server MVPhttp://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/simons
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|||Looks like I'm stuck.
In order to create a Full Text Index on my view, the view has to have a
unique index.
SQL 2005 doesn't allow you to create a index on a view if the view contains
an text, ntext, image or xml columns.
And mine does because we're storint the resume in an image column and the
resume is what we're after.
We can't add any special tokens, the content is an image field.
Any other ideas?
"Simon Sabin" <SimonSabin@.noemail.noemail> wrote in message
news:62959f1a36ede8c8edf7abdbb584@.msnews.microsoft .com...
> Hello Kyle,
> The other option is to add the office ID to the content (If the content
> was editable i.e. text/html)
> Then use a query like containstable(document, content,'OFFICE2345 AND "SQL
> SERVER DBA"')
> If the content is editabel this is by far the more manageable, and
> scalable.
> We did the index view thing and it is just not a neat solution. The token
> thing is much easier.
>
> Simon Sabin
> SQL Server MVP
> http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/simons
>
>
|||Kyle,
a) you can create an index on a view if you use VARCHAR(MAX) or
VARBINARY(MAX) instead of TEXT or IMAGE (which are deprecated in sql 2005).
b) AFAIK, those "tokens" can be other columns from the same view/table that
are also indexed in that FT catalog. You just specify CONTAINS(*,... Instead
of CONTAINS(MyClobColumn,...
it should work.
"Kyle Jedrusiak" <kjedrusiak@.princetoninformation.com> wrote in message
news:%23vIoXwFJHHA.536@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Looks like I'm stuck.
> In order to create a Full Text Index on my view, the view has to have a
> unique index.
> SQL 2005 doesn't allow you to create a index on a view if the view
> contains an text, ntext, image or xml columns.
> And mine does because we're storint the resume in an image column and the
> resume is what we're after.
> We can't add any special tokens, the content is an image field.
> Any other ideas?
>
> "Simon Sabin" <SimonSabin@.noemail.noemail> wrote in message
> news:62959f1a36ede8c8edf7abdbb584@.msnews.microsoft .com...
>
|||I will have to try changing the type over to VARBINARY(MAX). That may work.
It mght also be easier to FTI a second column since that will require less
program changes.
Thanks
"Lakusha" <Lakusha@.excite.com> wrote in message
news:uWBdE0KJHHA.3552@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Kyle,
> a) you can create an index on a view if you use VARCHAR(MAX) or
> VARBINARY(MAX) instead of TEXT or IMAGE (which are deprecated in sql
> 2005).
> b) AFAIK, those "tokens" can be other columns from the same view/table
> that are also indexed in that FT catalog. You just specify CONTAINS(*,...
> Instead of CONTAINS(MyClobColumn,...
> it should work.
>
> "Kyle Jedrusiak" <kjedrusiak@.princetoninformation.com> wrote in message
> news:%23vIoXwFJHHA.536@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
|||I added Office nvchar(8) to my table and populated int
select count(DocumentID) from Document where contains(*, 'Office01 and
cobol')
"Lakusha" <Lakusha@.excite.com> wrote in message
news:uWBdE0KJHHA.3552@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Kyle,
> a) you can create an index on a view if you use VARCHAR(MAX) or
> VARBINARY(MAX) instead of TEXT or IMAGE (which are deprecated in sql
> 2005).
> b) AFAIK, those "tokens" can be other columns from the same view/table
> that are also indexed in that FT catalog. You just specify CONTAINS(*,...
> Instead of CONTAINS(MyClobColumn,...
> it should work.
>
> "Kyle Jedrusiak" <kjedrusiak@.princetoninformation.com> wrote in message
> news:%23vIoXwFJHHA.536@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
|||I added a Office nvchar(8) column and populated it.
No matter what I specify for a search condition, it doesn't return what I'm
after.
For a test I tried
select count(DocumentID) from Document where contains(*, 'Office02 and
cobol')
'Office02' is in the new column, 'cobol' is in the image column.
If I search for them seperately there is overlap so the data is correct.
Ideas?
"Lakusha" <Lakusha@.excite.com> wrote in message
news:uWBdE0KJHHA.3552@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Kyle,
> a) you can create an index on a view if you use VARCHAR(MAX) or
> VARBINARY(MAX) instead of TEXT or IMAGE (which are deprecated in sql
> 2005).
> b) AFAIK, those "tokens" can be other columns from the same view/table
> that are also indexed in that FT catalog. You just specify CONTAINS(*,...
> Instead of CONTAINS(MyClobColumn,...
> it should work.
>
> "Kyle Jedrusiak" <kjedrusiak@.princetoninformation.com> wrote in message
> news:%23vIoXwFJHHA.536@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
|||To be clear the 'Office' column will only ever hold an office identifier
liket 'Office01' or 'Office13'.
The Content column has the interedting data.
We want to use containstable to give us the top n by rank DocumentIDs for a
particular office.
"Kyle Jedrusiak" <kjedrusiak@.princetoninformation.com> wrote in message
news:uM6mqsRKHHA.1468@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I added a Office nvchar(8) column and populated it.
> No matter what I specify for a search condition, it doesn't return what
> I'm after.
> For a test I tried
> select count(DocumentID) from Document where contains(*, 'Office02 and
> cobol')
> 'Office02' is in the new column, 'cobol' is in the image column.
> If I search for them seperately there is overlap so the data is correct.
> Ideas?
> "Lakusha" <Lakusha@.excite.com> wrote in message
> news:uWBdE0KJHHA.3552@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
No comments:
Post a Comment