FTI and multiple columns - another question, but opposite behaviour?

I have a table with 2 FTI columns, but my query results seems strange. If I
run this query:
AND CONTAINS( J.*, '"DEVELOPMENT" AND "MARKETING" AND "FIFE"' )
it returns no rows.
AND CONTAINS( J.*, '"DEVELOPMENT" AND "MARKETING"' )
this returns one row as both words are in the same FTI column.
AND CONTAINS( J.*, '"FIFE"' )
returns the same row, as FIFE exists in the other FTI column.
So, why doesn't the top query return the row in the results? Is this normal
behaviour? Is there anything I can do to make it work?
Thanks.
A contains query can't look across columns, a freetext query can. So if your
hits come from different columns a freetext query will return a hit, whereas
a contains won't.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Joe Bloggs" <Joe.Bloggs@.acme.com> wrote in message
news:%23C6lxLZcFHA.2520@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have a table with 2 FTI columns, but my query results seems strange. If
I
> run this query:
> AND CONTAINS( J.*, '"DEVELOPMENT" AND "MARKETING" AND "FIFE"' )
> it returns no rows.
> AND CONTAINS( J.*, '"DEVELOPMENT" AND "MARKETING"' )
> this returns one row as both words are in the same FTI column.
> AND CONTAINS( J.*, '"FIFE"' )
> returns the same row, as FIFE exists in the other FTI column.
> So, why doesn't the top query return the row in the results? Is this
normal
> behaviour? Is there anything I can do to make it work?
> Thanks.
>