Friday, March 23, 2012
FrontPage/SharePoint Designer Search and Replace Fills Transaction
pages), my transaction log on the SQL Server grows by about 200 MB of space!
This has caused major system headaches - the transaction log fills, causes
IIS to fail, causing my clients using FP / SP Designer not to be able to save
the files they have opened / edited.
That database is 400MB in size while the Transaction Log is now over 6GB.
and the minimum Log is now 6GB too. We can't keep having this log grow
exponential like this.
Also - In the event log, I see that there a couple of 'webparts' that are
failing on the global search and replace: WSS 2.0 Error: Failing in loading
assemble Customer.WebParts, Version=1.0.2.4.
We're running SQL Server 2000 SP4, on a Windows 2003 Server with WSS 2.0
using the latest versions of FrontPage and SharePoint Designer.
Thoughts?
After posting this, I started to search the WSS / Sharepoint forums (instead
of just SQL Server) and see that this is a common issue and found a variety
of ways to correct this.
Iza
"iZa" wrote:
> When we run a search and replace across all pages in one our web site (104
> pages), my transaction log on the SQL Server grows by about 200 MB of space!
> This has caused major system headaches - the transaction log fills, causes
> IIS to fail, causing my clients using FP / SP Designer not to be able to save
> the files they have opened / edited.
> That database is 400MB in size while the Transaction Log is now over 6GB.
> and the minimum Log is now 6GB too. We can't keep having this log grow
> exponential like this.
> Also - In the event log, I see that there a couple of 'webparts' that are
> failing on the global search and replace: WSS 2.0 Error: Failing in loading
> assemble Customer.WebParts, Version=1.0.2.4.
> We're running SQL Server 2000 SP4, on a Windows 2003 Server with WSS 2.0
> using the latest versions of FrontPage and SharePoint Designer.
> Thoughts?
FrontPage/SharePoint Designer Search and Replace Fills Transaction
pages), my transaction log on the SQL Server grows by about 200 MB of space!
This has caused major system headaches - the transaction log fills, causes
IIS to fail, causing my clients using FP / SP Designer not to be able to save
the files they have opened / edited.
That database is 400MB in size while the Transaction Log is now over 6GB.
and the minimum Log is now 6GB too. We can't keep having this log grow
exponential like this.
Also - In the event log, I see that there a couple of 'webparts' that are
failing on the global search and replace: WSS 2.0 Error: Failing in loading
assemble Customer.WebParts, Version=1.0.2.4.
We're running SQL Server 2000 SP4, on a Windows 2003 Server with WSS 2.0
using the latest versions of FrontPage and SharePoint Designer.
Thoughts?After posting this, I started to search the WSS / Sharepoint forums (instead
of just SQL Server) and see that this is a common issue and found a variety
of ways to correct this.
Iza
"iZa" wrote:
> When we run a search and replace across all pages in one our web site (104
> pages), my transaction log on the SQL Server grows by about 200 MB of space!
> This has caused major system headaches - the transaction log fills, causes
> IIS to fail, causing my clients using FP / SP Designer not to be able to save
> the files they have opened / edited.
> That database is 400MB in size while the Transaction Log is now over 6GB.
> and the minimum Log is now 6GB too. We can't keep having this log grow
> exponential like this.
> Also - In the event log, I see that there a couple of 'webparts' that are
> failing on the global search and replace: WSS 2.0 Error: Failing in loading
> assemble Customer.WebParts, Version=1.0.2.4.
> We're running SQL Server 2000 SP4, on a Windows 2003 Server with WSS 2.0
> using the latest versions of FrontPage and SharePoint Designer.
> Thoughts?sql
FrontPage/SharePoint Designer Search and Replace Fills Transaction
pages), my transaction log on the SQL Server grows by about 200 MB of space!
This has caused major system headaches - the transaction log fills, causes
IIS to fail, causing my clients using FP / SP Designer not to be able to sav
e
the files they have opened / edited.
That database is 400MB in size while the Transaction Log is now over 6GB.
and the minimum Log is now 6GB too. We can't keep having this log grow
exponential like this.
Also - In the event log, I see that there a couple of 'webparts' that are
failing on the global search and replace: WSS 2.0 Error: Failing in loading
assemble Customer.WebParts, Version=1.0.2.4.
We're running SQL Server 2000 SP4, on a Windows 2003 Server with WSS 2.0
using the latest versions of FrontPage and SharePoint Designer.
Thoughts?After posting this, I started to search the WSS / Sharepoint forums (instead
of just SQL Server) and see that this is a common issue and found a variety
of ways to correct this.
Iza
"iZa" wrote:
> When we run a search and replace across all pages in one our web site (104
> pages), my transaction log on the SQL Server grows by about 200 MB of spac
e!
> This has caused major system headaches - the transaction log fills, causes
> IIS to fail, causing my clients using FP / SP Designer not to be able to s
ave
> the files they have opened / edited.
> That database is 400MB in size while the Transaction Log is now over 6GB.
> and the minimum Log is now 6GB too. We can't keep having this log grow
> exponential like this.
> Also - In the event log, I see that there a couple of 'webparts' that are
> failing on the global search and replace: WSS 2.0 Error: Failing in loadin
g
> assemble Customer.WebParts, Version=1.0.2.4.
> We're running SQL Server 2000 SP4, on a Windows 2003 Server with WSS 2.0
> using the latest versions of FrontPage and SharePoint Designer.
> Thoughts?
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Fragmented databases and database backup
Hi,
If a database file size grows and shrinks it becomes fragmented. When creating a backup of a database and to restore it on another SQL Server, does it increase the fragmentation on that server?
How can I keep database files defragmented? Does SQL Server have tools for that or should Windows defragmentation tools be used?
/M
I think you are confusing data file fragmentation with disk fragmentation. They are two separate issues although they both affect performance of SQL Server.
If you backup your database and restore to a different server, it will not have any disk fragmentation if there is enough contiguous space to hold all of the data. Otherwise, it is at the mercy of the new disk drive.
For file fragmentation, creating a backup does not relocate data within the files. So a restored backup on a new server will have the exact same file fragmentation as the original version on the old server.
|||Thank you for your answer, I was not aware of the two different framentation problems. Now I am curious on fragmentation solutions. Our SQL Server database is set to grow 10 % when needed and not to auto shrink.
I guess disk fragmentation can be solved using the standard Disk Defragmenter in Windows.
How can file fragmentation be solved within the database files?
/M